GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs Ismail Ibrahim Sama — 4/2026

Case under Electricity Act, 2003 Section 135. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

SMRY - SUMMARY

CNR: GJDW010001192026

Filing Number

4/2026

Filing Date

11-Feb-2026

Registration No

4/2026

Registration Date

11-Feb-2026

Court

DISTRICT COURT, KHAMBHALIA

Judge

7-Principal District & Sessions Judge

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOK ADALAT

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

1298

Police Station

GUVNL POLICE STATION - JAMNAGAR DISTRICT

Year

2018

Acts & Sections

Electricity Act, 2003 Section 135

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Ismail Ibrahim Sama

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: Government of Gujarat v. Ismail Ibrahim Sama (4/2026) The National Lok Adalat court discharged respondent Ismail Ibrahim Sama from a criminal case filed under Section 135 of the Indian Electricity Act, 2003, after he paid the outstanding electricity bill amount and compounding charges to the discom as directed by the TDS (Technical Data Sheet) officer's report. The court found that the primary offense under Section 152 of the Act had been satisfied through payment, warranting discharge from prosecution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  4. 11-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 4/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Government of Gujarat v. Ismail Ibrahim Sama (4/2026) The National Lok Adalat court discharged respondent Ismail Ibrahim Sama from a criminal case filed under Section 135 of the Indian Electricity Act, 2003, after he paid the outstanding electricity bill amount and compounding charges to the discom as directed by the TDS (Technical Data Sheet) officer's report. The court found that the primary offense under Section 152 of the Act had been satisfied through payment, warranting discharge from prosecution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case