BHALABHAI KESHAVLALA MAKAVANA vs RAJUBHAI PARTAPBHAI TADAVI — 53/2024

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166,. Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 18th March 2026.

MACP - MAC PETITION

CNR: GJDH120005582024

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

53/2024

Filing Date

20-03-2024

Registration No

53/2024

Registration Date

20-03-2024

Court

ADDITIONAL DIST. COURT - LIMKHEDA

Judge

3-ADDL.DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE

Decision Date

18th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED

Acts & Sections

MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1988 Section 166,

Petitioner(s)

BHALABHAI KESHAVLALA MAKAVANA

Adv. S S DADI

Respondent(s)

RAJUBHAI PARTAPBHAI TADAVI

BAKULBHAI PARTAPBHAI TADVI

BAJAJ ALLIANZ GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD.

Adv. A B RAVAL

Hearing History

Judge: 3-ADDL.DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE

18-03-2026

Disposed

17-03-2026

JUDGEMENT

07-03-2026

JUDGEMENT

21-02-2026

EVIDENCE OF OPPONENT

31-01-2026

EVIDENCE OF APPLICANT

Final Orders / Judgements

18-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Summary The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal at Dahod awarded Rs. 12,75,822 (plus 7% interest) to claimant Bhalabhai Keshavlal Makwana, who sustained fracture injuries when hit by a rash and negligently driven motorcycle on December 1, 2023. The court found the driver, owner, and insurer (Bajaj Allianz) jointly liable, rejecting the insurer's defense that the driver lacked proper motorcycle licensing credentials, as the insurer failed to prove the alleged breach of policy conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal at Dahod awarded Rs. 12,75,822 (plus 7% interest) to claimant Bhalabhai Keshavlal Makwana, who sustained fracture injuries when hit by a rash and negligently driven motorcycle on December 1, 2023. The court found the driver, owner, and insurer (Bajaj Allianz) jointly liable, rejecting the insurer's defense that the driver lacked proper motorcycle licensing credentials, as the insurer failed to prove the alleged breach of policy conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

ADDITIONAL DIST. COURT - LIMKHEDA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case