SUBALIBEN KANUBHAI MACHHAR vs LIBERTY GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. Advocate - A B RAVAL — 48/2021
Case under Limitation Act, 1963 Section 5,. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 13th March 2026.
MACMA - MAC MISC. APPLICATION
CNR: GJDH120002502021
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
48/2021
Filing Date
18-03-2021
Registration No
48/2021
Registration Date
18-03-2021
Court
ADDITIONAL DIST. COURT - LIMKHEDA
Judge
2-2nd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SUBALIBEN KANUBHAI MACHHAR
Adv. V.M.DHANEKAR
Respondent(s)
LIBERTY GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. Advocate - A B RAVAL
LAXMANBHAI SABIYABHAI MACHAR
Adv. R S PATEL
SABIYABHAI DAHARIYABHAI MACHAR
Adv. R S PATEL
Hearing History
Judge: 2-2nd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 06-03-2026 | HEARING | |
| 28-02-2026 | HEARING | |
| 18-02-2026 | HEARING | |
| 31-01-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal allowed Subaliben Kanubhai Machhar's application for delay condonation in filing her motor accident claim petition, holding that the 2019 amendment to Section 166(3) of the Motor Vehicle Act (introducing a 6-month filing limit) cannot be applied retrospectively to her accident occurring on August 3, 2020. The tribunal registered her claim petition and directed her to appear for early hearing, relying on High Court precedent that amendments cannot apply retroactively. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal allowed Subaliben Kanubhai Machhar's application for delay condonation in filing her motor accident claim petition, holding that the 2019 amendment to Section 166(3) of the Motor Vehicle Act (introducing a 6-month filing limit) cannot be applied retrospectively to her accident occurring on August 3, 2020. The tribunal registered her claim petition and directed her to appear for early hearing, relying on High Court precedent that amendments cannot apply retroactively. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts