PUNIYABHAI GALIYABHAI MACHHAR vs LIBARTY GENERAL INSURANCE CO.LTD. Advocate - A B RAVAL — 47/2021
Case under Limitation Act, 1963 Section 5,. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 13th March 2026.
MACMA - MAC MISC. APPLICATION
CNR: GJDH120002492021
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
47/2021
Filing Date
18-03-2021
Registration No
47/2021
Registration Date
18-03-2021
Court
ADDITIONAL DIST. COURT - LIMKHEDA
Judge
2-2nd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PUNIYABHAI GALIYABHAI MACHHAR
Adv. V.M.DHANEKAR
Respondent(s)
LIBARTY GENERAL INSURANCE CO.LTD. Advocate - A B RAVAL
LAXMANBHAI SABIYABHAI MACHAR
Adv. R S PATEL
SABIYABHAI DAHRIYABHAI MACHAR
Adv. R S PATEL
Hearing History
Judge: 2-2nd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 06-03-2026 | HEARING | |
| 28-02-2026 | HEARING | |
| 18-02-2026 | HEARING | |
| 31-01-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal allowed Puniyabhai Galiyabhai Machhar's application for delay condonation and directed registration of his motor accident claim petition. The court held that the amended Section 166(3) of the Motor Vehicle Act, 1988 (imposing a six-month filing limit effective from 01.04.2022) cannot be applied retrospectively to the accident occurring on 03.08.2020, relying on High Court precedent that such amendments are not retrospectively applicable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal allowed Puniyabhai Galiyabhai Machhar's application for delay condonation and directed registration of his motor accident claim petition. The court held that the amended Section 166(3) of the Motor Vehicle Act, 1988 (imposing a six-month filing limit effective from 01.04.2022) cannot be applied retrospectively to the accident occurring on 03.08.2020, relying on High Court precedent that such amendments are not retrospectively applicable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts