Govenment of Gujarat vs LALSINGBHAI RUPSINGBHAI MACHAR Advocate - R B BHAVSAR — 150/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 85,66(1)B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJDH100001602026

Filing Number

150/2026

Filing Date

07-Feb-2026

Registration No

150/2026

Registration Date

07-Feb-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, SANJELI

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 16-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 85,66(1)B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Govenment of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.LALSINGBHAI RUPSINGBHAI MACHAR Advocate - R B BHAVSAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary The court convicted the accused under Section 66(1) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act for unauthorized liquor possession and sentenced him to imprisonment until the court's rising, a fine of ₹300, with 7 days simple imprisonment as default punishment. The court considered the accused's voluntary confession, clean criminal record, and socio-economic circumstances in awarding lenient punishment to serve the ends of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Plea

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 18-Feb-2026

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 07-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 07-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 150/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court convicted the accused under Section 66(1) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act for unauthorized liquor possession and sentenced him to imprisonment until the court's rising, a fine of ₹300, with 7 days simple imprisonment as default punishment. The court considered the accused's voluntary confession, clean criminal record, and socio-economic circumstances in awarding lenient punishment to serve the ends of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case