MANSINGBHAI KALUBHAI BARIYA vs VALSINGBHAI KALUBHAI BARIYA Advocate - P M PADHIYAR, S M RAVAT — 3/2024

Case under Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 34,35. Status: Plaintiff Evidence. Next hearing: 08th April 2026.

Plaintiff Evidence Next hearing 08-Apr-2026 this date has passed

RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT

CNR: GJDH100001172024

Filing Number

3/2024

Filing Date

09-Feb-2024

Registration No

3/2024

Registration Date

09-Feb-2024

Court

TALUKA COURT, SANJELI

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Last updated 03-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 34,35

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MANSINGBHAI KALUBHAI BARIYA

    Adv. R B BHAVSAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.VALSINGBHAI KALUBHAI BARIYA Advocate - P M PADHIYAR, S M RAVAT

  2. 2.LALSINGBHAI KALUBHAI BARIYA

    Adv. M M PRAJAPATI

Case History

  1. 08-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  3. 07-Mar-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 19-Feb-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 06-Feb-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: The plaintiff's application for interim injunction was rejected. The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish a strong prima facie case, as the suit land is registered in defendant no. 1's name in revenue records and the plaintiff provided insufficient documentary evidence of co-ownership. The court also ruled that injunction cannot be granted against the legal title holder and that the balance of convenience and irreparable loss factors did not favor the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  6. 06-Feb-2026

    Issues

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 15-Jan-2026

    Order On Injuction Application

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 23-Dec-2025

    Order On Injuction Application

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  9. 04-Dec-2025

    Order On Injuction Application

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  10. 18-Nov-2025

    Order On Injuction Application

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  11. 03-Nov-2025

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  12. 06-Oct-2025

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  13. 15-Sep-2025

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  14. 22-Aug-2025

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  15. 01-Aug-2025

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  16. 08-Jul-2025

    For Counter Affidavit

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  17. 13-Jun-2025

    For Counter Affidavit

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  18. 25-Apr-2025

    For Counter Affidavit

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  19. 18-Mar-2025

    For Counter Affidavit

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  20. 11-Feb-2025

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  21. 03-Jan-2025

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  22. 03-Dec-2024

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  23. 22-Oct-2024

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  24. 17-Sep-2024

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  25. 20-Aug-2024

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  26. 16-Jul-2024

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  27. 18-Jun-2024

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  28. 07-May-2024

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  29. 02-Apr-2024

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  30. 01-Mar-2024

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  31. 09-Feb-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  32. 09-Feb-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 3/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The plaintiff's application for interim injunction was rejected. The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish a strong prima facie case, as the suit land is registered in defendant no. 1's name in revenue records and the plaintiff provided insufficient documentary evidence of co-ownership. The court also ruled that injunction cannot be granted against the legal title holder and that the balance of convenience and irreparable loss factors did not favor the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case