LATE SOHANBHAI MIKHEL NIHARTA NA VARASO-KANTABEN SOHANBHAI NIHARTA vs DAXIN GUJARAT VIJ COMPANY LIM Advocate - M A PARIKH — 26/2024
Case under Employees Compensation Act, 1923 Section 04. Disposed: Uncontested--TRANSFER TO on 10th April 2026.
WC FATAL LC - W.C. Application Fatal
CNR: GJDH090001382024
Filing Number
26/2024
Filing Date
16-Oct-2024
Registration No
26/2024
Registration Date
16-Oct-2024
Court
LABOUR COURT, Dahod
Judge
1-Judge, Labour Court
Decision Date
10-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--TRANSFER TO
Last updated 22-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.LATE SOHANBHAI MIKHEL NIHARTA NA VARASO-KANTABEN SOHANBHAI NIHARTA
Adv. M T BHURIA
Respondent(s)
-
1.DAXIN GUJARAT VIJ COMPANY LIM Advocate - M A PARIKH
-
2.JAYSUKHBHAI KARSHANBHAI VIRANI
Adv. S R KATARA
-
3.IFFCO TOKIYO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Adv. L R PATHAK
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Apr-2026
JudegementView PDF
The court transferred the workers' compensation case from the Dahod Labor Court to the Surat Labor Court under Section 21 of the Workmen's Compensation Act, as the accident occurred in Bardoli, Surat district, not Dahod, and the employee's original residence was in Rajasthan. The court found that Surat had proper jurisdiction to handle the claim filed by the dependents of deceased worker Sohanbhai Mikhel Niharta. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Apr-2026
Disposed
Judge, Labour Court
-
09-Apr-2026
For Evidence of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
08-Apr-2026
For Evidence of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
25-Mar-2026
For Evidence of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
18-Mar-2026
For Evidence of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
11-Mar-2026
For Evidence of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
25-Feb-2026
For Evidence of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
18-Feb-2026
For Evidence of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
04-Feb-2026
For Evidence of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
28-Jan-2026
For Evidence of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
07-Jan-2026
For Evidence of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
24-Dec-2025
For Evidence of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
10-Dec-2025
For Evidence of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
03-Dec-2025
For Evidence of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
19-Nov-2025
For Evidence of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
08-Oct-2025
For Evidence of opponent
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
17-Sep-2025
For Evidence of opponent
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
20-Aug-2025
For Evidence of opponent
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
06-Aug-2025
For Other evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
11-Jun-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
21-May-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
07-May-2025
For Evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
02-Apr-2025
Issues
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
05-Mar-2025
For Reply of Opponant
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
05-Feb-2025
For Reply of Opponant
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
01-Jan-2025
For Reply of Opponant
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
18-Nov-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
16-Oct-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 26/2024
The court transferred the workers' compensation case from the Dahod Labor Court to the Surat Labor Court under Section 21 of the Workmen's Compensation Act, as the accident occurred in Bardoli, Surat district, not Dahod, and the employee's original residence was in Rajasthan. The court found that Surat had proper jurisdiction to handle the claim filed by the dependents of deceased worker Sohanbhai Mikhel Niharta. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts