Government of Gujarat vs SANJAYBHAI NANJIBHAI BHABHOR Advocate - R B MOHANIYA — 513/2026
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65E,98(2),116B. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 23rd April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJDH080005652026
Filing Number
513/2026
Filing Date
18-Feb-2026
Registration No
513/2026
Registration Date
18-Feb-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, GARBADA
Judge
3-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
23-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 22-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11821024260157
Police Station
GARBADA POLICE STATION - DAHOD DISTRICT
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.SANJAYBHAI NANJIBHAI BHABHOR Advocate - R B MOHANIYA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
23-Apr-2026
Judegement
Summary of Criminal Case P13/2026 The court acquitted Sanjaybhai Nanjibhai Bhabhor of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act (Sections 65-I, 98(2), 116(B)) for alleged illegal possession of 118 bottles of English whisky and Royal Stag whisky worth ₹90,192 seized from his vehicle. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt, citing insufficient corroboration from independent witnesses, lack of technical FSL evidence confirming the seized liquor's quality/quantity, and credibility issues with the investigation procedure. The court applied the "benefit of doubt" principle, acquitting the accused and ordering the seized contraband destroyed after appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
23-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
18-Mar-2026
Further Statement
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
23-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
18-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 513/2026
Summary of Criminal Case P13/2026 The court acquitted Sanjaybhai Nanjibhai Bhabhor of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act (Sections 65-I, 98(2), 116(B)) for alleged illegal possession of 118 bottles of English whisky and Royal Stag whisky worth ₹90,192 seized from his vehicle. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt, citing insufficient corroboration from independent witnesses, lack of technical FSL evidence confirming the seized liquor's quality/quantity, and credibility issues with the investigation procedure. The court applied the "benefit of doubt" principle, acquitting the accused and ordering the seized contraband destroyed after appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts