Pappubhai Galubhai Rathod(Legal Heir)(Dead) vs Ramchandbhai Nanabhai Rathod Advocate - R B MOHANIYA — 9/2022
Case under Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 34,38,. Status: PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 10th April 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJDH080004752022
Next Hearing
10th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
9/2022
Filing Date
11-05-2022
Registration No
9/2022
Registration Date
11-05-2022
Court
TALUKA COURT, GARBADA
Judge
3-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Pappubhai Galubhai Rathod(Legal Heir)(Dead)
Adv. N B SONI1.
Rekhaben Pappubhai Rathod 1.
Mayurbhai Pappubhai Chavda 1.
Nasikbhai Pappubhai Rathod
Dhaniben Galubhai Rathod
Respondent(s)
Ramchandbhai Nanabhai Rathod Advocate - R B MOHANIYA
Manubhai Ramchandbhai Rathod
Adv. R B MOHANIYA
Lalabhai Manubhai Rathod
Adv. R B MOHANIYA
Nileshbhai Manubhai Rathod
Hearing History
Judge: 3-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 23-01-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 19-12-2025 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 21-11-2025 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 10-10-2025 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Summary The plaintiff's appeal for an injunction order preventing the defendant from constructing on disputed land is dismissed. The court found that the plaintiff failed to provide adequate documentary evidence of ownership over property number 2158/2, including no registered title deed or survey records. The court ruled that the plaintiff's claims are unsubstantiated and that they cannot obtain an injunction without proper proof of ownership. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The plaintiff's appeal for an injunction order preventing the defendant from constructing on disputed land is dismissed. The court found that the plaintiff failed to provide adequate documentary evidence of ownership over property number 2158/2, including no registered title deed or survey records. The court ruled that the plaintiff's claims are unsubstantiated and that they cannot obtain an injunction without proper proof of ownership. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts