Mansukhbhai Parsingbhai Gamar vs Kasnabhai Malabhai Bhabhor Advocate - R.B.MOHANIYA — 11/2020

Case under Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 34,36,. Status: DEFENDANT EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 27th March 2026.

RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT

CNR: GJDH080003762020

DEFENDANT EVIDENCE

Next Hearing

27th March 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

11/2020

Filing Date

08-09-2020

Registration No

11/2020

Registration Date

08-09-2020

Court

TALUKA COURT, GARBADA

Judge

3-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Acts & Sections

SPECIFIC RELIEF ACT, 1963 Section 34,36,

Petitioner(s)

Mansukhbhai Parsingbhai Gamar

Adv. A.K.PARMAR

Galiben Parsingbhai Gamar

Adv. A.K.PARMAR

Respondent(s)

Kasnabhai Malabhai Bhabhor Advocate - R.B.MOHANIYA

Bachubhai Malabhai Bhabhor(Dead)

Adv. R.B.MOHANIYA

Kasni Malabhai Bhabhor

Adv. R.B.MOHANIYA

Dipabhai Sukabhai Bariya

Adv. R.B.MOHANIYA

Navalbhai Sukabhai Bariya

Adv. R.B.MOHANIYA

Hearing History

Judge: 3-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

06-03-2026

DEFENDANT EVIDENCE

13-02-2026

DEFENDANT EVIDENCE

06-02-2026

DEFENDANT EVIDENCE

09-01-2026

DEFENDANT EVIDENCE

26-12-2025

DEFENDANT EVIDENCE

Interim Orders

01-10-2020
ORDER

Case Summary R.C.S. No. 11/2020 - This is a Gujarat civil suit regarding agricultural land ownership and inheritance rights in village Vajelalav, Tarapur taluka. The court partially allowed the plaintiffs' suit and partially dismissed the defendants' counter-claim. The judgment grants the plaintiffs (defendants 1-3) half share of the disputed land as legal heirs, while defendants 4-5 are denied any claim, and mandates maintenance of the property status quo until final resolution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary R.C.S. No. 11/2020 - This is a Gujarat civil suit regarding agricultural land ownership and inheritance rights in village Vajelalav, Tarapur taluka. The court partially allowed the plaintiffs' suit and partially dismissed the defendants' counter-claim. The judgment grants the plaintiffs (defendants 1-3) half share of the disputed land as legal heirs, while defendants 4-5 are denied any claim, and mandates maintenance of the property status quo until final resolution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, GARBADA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case