Government of Gujarat vs AMITBHAI BALVANTBHAI DAMOR — 116/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 281. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 21st April 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJDH060001852026

Filing Number

116/2026

Filing Date

11-Feb-2026

Registration No

116/2026

Registration Date

11-Feb-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, DHANPUR

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

21-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 22-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11821014251002

Police Station

DHANPUR POLICE STATION - DAHOD DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 281

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.AMITBHAI BALVANTBHAI DAMOR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 21-Apr-2026

    Judegement

    Case Summary: CC No. 116/2026 Government of Gujarat v. Amitbhai Balvantbhai Damor The court acquitted the accused under Indian Penal Code Section 281 (rash or negligent driving), finding that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt. Although the complainant alleged the accused recklessly operated a vehicle without a valid license, endangering pedestrians, the court found the witness testimony unreliable—key witnesses contradicted themselves, admitting heavy traffic and poor road conditions at the incident location. The court applied the benefit of reasonable doubt and discharged the accused, directing release of bail bonds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 21-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 02-Apr-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 18-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 11-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 116/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CC No. 116/2026 Government of Gujarat v. Amitbhai Balvantbhai Damor The court acquitted the accused under Indian Penal Code Section 281 (rash or negligent driving), finding that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt. Although the complainant alleged the accused recklessly operated a vehicle without a valid license, endangering pedestrians, the court found the witness testimony unreliable—key witnesses contradicted themselves, admitting heavy traffic and poor road conditions at the incident location. The court applied the benefit of reasonable doubt and discharged the accused, directing release of bail bonds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case