Government of Gujarat vs VINODBHAI VAJESINGBHAI PASAYA Advocate - N B CHAUHAN — 112/2026
Case under Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65E,116B. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 16th May 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJDH060001812026
Filing Number
112/2026
Filing Date
11-Feb-2026
Registration No
112/2026
Registration Date
11-Feb-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, DHANPUR
Judge
1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
16-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 22-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11821014251054
Police Station
DHANPUR POLICE STATION - DAHOD DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.VINODBHAI VAJESINGBHAI PASAYA Advocate - N B CHAUHAN
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-May-2026
Judegement
Case Summary: CC No. 112/2026 The court acquitted the accused Vinodbhai Vajesingbhai Pasaya of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act Sections 65(E) and 116(B), finding the prosecution failed to establish conscious possession of foreign liquor beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted critical investigative lapses: the actual recovery of contraband from the accused's possession was not proved, panch witnesses did not corroborate the prosecution case, no independent witnesses were examined, and proper sealing procedures were not followed, rendering the entire investigation procedure tainted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-May-2026
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
04-May-2026
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
23-Apr-2026
Further Statement
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
09-Apr-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
18-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 112/2026
Case Summary: CC No. 112/2026 The court acquitted the accused Vinodbhai Vajesingbhai Pasaya of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act Sections 65(E) and 116(B), finding the prosecution failed to establish conscious possession of foreign liquor beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted critical investigative lapses: the actual recovery of contraband from the accused's possession was not proved, panch witnesses did not corroborate the prosecution case, no independent witnesses were examined, and proper sealing procedures were not followed, rendering the entire investigation procedure tainted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts