Government of Gujarat vs SUNILBHAI URFE SUNIYABHAI CHHAGANBHAI MUHANIYA Advocate - P K DEVAL — 106/2026

Case under Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65E,116B. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 14th May 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJDH060001752026

Filing Number

106/2026

Filing Date

11-Feb-2026

Registration No

106/2026

Registration Date

11-Feb-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, DHANPUR

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 22-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11821014250604

Police Station

DHANPUR POLICE STATION - DAHOD DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65E,116B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SUNILBHAI URFE SUNIYABHAI CHHAGANBHAI MUHANIYA Advocate - P K DEVAL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-May-2026

    Judegement

    Case Summary: CC No. 106/2026 Decision: The court acquitted the defendant under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, Sections 65(I) and 116(B), finding the prosecution failed to prove conscious possession of foreign liquor beyond reasonable doubt. Key Reasoning: The court determined that: (1) actual physical possession of the seized liquor by the accused was not established on record; (2) the two independent panch witnesses did not corroborate the prosecution's case; (3) proper sealing procedures were not followed; and (4) the investigating officer's entire procedure appeared tainted, preventing any conviction based on that investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-May-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 07-May-2026

    Further Statement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 23-Apr-2026

    Further Statement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 09-Apr-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 18-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 11-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 106/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CC No. 106/2026 Decision: The court acquitted the defendant under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, Sections 65(I) and 116(B), finding the prosecution failed to prove conscious possession of foreign liquor beyond reasonable doubt. Key Reasoning: The court determined that: (1) actual physical possession of the seized liquor by the accused was not established on record; (2) the two independent panch witnesses did not corroborate the prosecution's case; (3) proper sealing procedures were not followed; and (4) the investigating officer's entire procedure appeared tainted, preventing any conviction based on that investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case