Government of Gujarat vs BHAVSINGBHAI LALABHAI SANGADA Advocate - S D PANDOR — 4759/2025

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJDH050055542025

Filing Number

4758/2025

Filing Date

18-Dec-2025

Registration No

4759/2025

Registration Date

18-Dec-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, JHALOD

Judge

3-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 16-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BHAVSINGBHAI LALABHAI SANGADA Advocate - S D PANDOR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order

    The court convicted the defendant Bhavsinghbhai Lalabhai Sangada under the Gujarat Prohibition Act for illegal possession of liquor without a valid permit. The defendant pleaded guilty and the court accepted his plea, finding it voluntary. Considering the defendant's first-time offense, poor economic circumstances, and status as sole family earner, the court imposed a reduced sentence of imprisonment up to 5 days and a fine of Rs. 200, departing from the minimum statutory punishment, based on special and reasonable grounds shown in precedent case law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  5. 21-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  6. 28-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 18-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 4759/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted the defendant Bhavsinghbhai Lalabhai Sangada under the Gujarat Prohibition Act for illegal possession of liquor without a valid permit. The defendant pleaded guilty and the court accepted his plea, finding it voluntary. Considering the defendant's first-time offense, poor economic circumstances, and status as sole family earner, the court imposed a reduced sentence of imprisonment up to 5 days and a fine of Rs. 200, departing from the minimum statutory punishment, based on special and reasonable grounds shown in precedent case law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case