Government of Gujarat vs SATABHAI MAGANBHAI DODIYAR — 4754/2025

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJDH050055492025

Filing Number

4753/2025

Filing Date

18-Dec-2025

Registration No

4754/2025

Registration Date

18-Dec-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, JHALOD

Judge

3-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 16-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SATABHAI MAGANBHAI DODIYAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order

    The court found the accused guilty of illegally possessing alcohol in violation of the Gujarat Prohibition Act and sentenced him to imprisonment up to court's discretion plus a fine of Rs. 200, with an alternative simple imprisonment of 5 days if the fine is not paid. The court imposed a lenient sentence below the statutory minimum, considering the accused's impoverished circumstances, first-time offense, and status as the sole family earner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  5. 21-Feb-2026

    Process To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  6. 28-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 18-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 4754/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court found the accused guilty of illegally possessing alcohol in violation of the Gujarat Prohibition Act and sentenced him to imprisonment up to court's discretion plus a fine of Rs. 200, with an alternative simple imprisonment of 5 days if the fine is not paid. The court imposed a lenient sentence below the statutory minimum, considering the accused's impoverished circumstances, first-time offense, and status as the sole family earner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case