Government of Gujarat vs BHARATBHAI DALSINGBHAI MACHHAR — 4736/2025
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJDH050055302025
Filing Number
4735/2025
Filing Date
18-Dec-2025
Registration No
4736/2025
Registration Date
18-Dec-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, JHALOD
Judge
3-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
Last updated 16-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.BHARATBHAI DALSINGBHAI MACHHAR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
Order
The court convicted the accused, Bhartbhai Dalsing Macchar, under the Gujarat Prohibition Act for illegally possessing alcohol without a valid permit, and accepted his voluntary guilty plea. Considering the accused's poor financial circumstances, first-time offense status, and being the sole earner for his family, the court imposed a reduced sentence of imprisonment up to 15 days and a fine of ₹200, departing from the minimum prescribed punishment under law based on special circumstances and mitigating factors. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
13-Mar-2026
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
06-Mar-2026
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
28-Feb-2026
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
20-Feb-2026
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
21-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 4736/2025
The court convicted the accused, Bhartbhai Dalsing Macchar, under the Gujarat Prohibition Act for illegally possessing alcohol without a valid permit, and accepted his voluntary guilty plea. Considering the accused's poor financial circumstances, first-time offense status, and being the sole earner for his family, the court imposed a reduced sentence of imprisonment up to 15 days and a fine of ₹200, departing from the minimum prescribed punishment under law based on special circumstances and mitigating factors. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts