Government of Gujarat vs DINESHBHAI BHURSINGBHAI GARASIYA — 4723/2025
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA,. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJDH050055122025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
4722/2025
Filing Date
17-12-2025
Registration No
4723/2025
Registration Date
17-12-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, JHALOD
Judge
3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
DINESHBHAI BHURSINGBHAI GARASIYA
Hearing History
Judge: 3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Disposed
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 13-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED | |
| 06-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED | |
| 02-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED | |
| 12-02-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court convicted the accused under the Gujarat Prohibition Act for illegally possessing alcohol without a permit and sentenced him to imprisonment up to court discretion plus a fine of ₹200, with an alternative simple imprisonment of 5 days if the fine is not paid. The court imposed a lenient sentence considering the accused's first-time offense, poor economic condition, and family responsibilities, applying the principle established in State of Gujarat v. Natwer Harchanji that courts may award less than the minimum prescribed punishment when justified by special circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court convicted the accused under the Gujarat Prohibition Act for illegally possessing alcohol without a permit and sentenced him to imprisonment up to court discretion plus a fine of ₹200, with an alternative simple imprisonment of 5 days if the fine is not paid. The court imposed a lenient sentence considering the accused's first-time offense, poor economic condition, and family responsibilities, applying the principle established in State of Gujarat v. Natwer Harchanji that courts may award less than the minimum prescribed punishment when justified by special circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts