Government of Gujarat vs DINESHBHAI BHURSINGBHAI GARASIYA — 4723/2025

Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA,. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJDH050055122025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

4722/2025

Filing Date

17-12-2025

Registration No

4723/2025

Registration Date

17-12-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, JHALOD

Judge

3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Acts & Sections

GUJARAT (BOMBAY) PROHIBITION ACT, 1949 Section 65AA,

Petitioner(s)

Government of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

DINESHBHAI BHURSINGBHAI GARASIYA

Hearing History

Judge: 3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM

14-03-2026

Disposed

13-03-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

06-03-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

02-03-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

12-02-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
ORDER

Summary The court convicted the accused under the Gujarat Prohibition Act for illegally possessing alcohol without a permit and sentenced him to imprisonment up to court discretion plus a fine of ₹200, with an alternative simple imprisonment of 5 days if the fine is not paid. The court imposed a lenient sentence considering the accused's first-time offense, poor economic condition, and family responsibilities, applying the principle established in State of Gujarat v. Natwer Harchanji that courts may award less than the minimum prescribed punishment when justified by special circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court convicted the accused under the Gujarat Prohibition Act for illegally possessing alcohol without a permit and sentenced him to imprisonment up to court discretion plus a fine of ₹200, with an alternative simple imprisonment of 5 days if the fine is not paid. The court imposed a lenient sentence considering the accused's first-time offense, poor economic condition, and family responsibilities, applying the principle established in State of Gujarat v. Natwer Harchanji that courts may award less than the minimum prescribed punishment when justified by special circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, JHALOD All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case