Government of Gujarat vs MAHENDRABHAI RAYSINGBHAI DAMOR — 4246/2025

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJDH050049502025

Filing Number

4245/2025

Filing Date

17-Oct-2025

Registration No

4246/2025

Registration Date

17-Oct-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, JHALOD

Judge

3-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 16-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MAHENDRABHAI RAYSINGBHAI DAMOR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order

    The court convicted the accused under the Gujarat Prohibition Act for illegally possessing liquor without a valid permit. The accused pleaded guilty, and the court accepted his confession as voluntary. Considering the accused's poor economic condition, family responsibilities, and that this was his first offense, the court sentenced him to imprisonment up to court discretion and a fine of Rs. 200, with an alternative jail term of 5 days, imposing a sentence less than the statutory minimum as permitted under law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  5. 13-Feb-2026

    Process To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  6. 20-Jan-2026

    Process To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  7. 19-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 17-Oct-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 4246/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted the accused under the Gujarat Prohibition Act for illegally possessing liquor without a valid permit. The accused pleaded guilty, and the court accepted his confession as voluntary. Considering the accused's poor economic condition, family responsibilities, and that this was his first offense, the court sentenced him to imprisonment up to court discretion and a fine of Rs. 200, with an alternative jail term of 5 days, imposing a sentence less than the statutory minimum as permitted under law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case