Government of Gujarat vs MAHESHBHAI BHURSINGBHAI SANGDA — 4241/2025
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJDH050049452025
Filing Number
4240/2025
Filing Date
17-Oct-2025
Registration No
4241/2025
Registration Date
17-Oct-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, JHALOD
Judge
3-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
Last updated 16-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.MAHESHBHAI BHURSINGBHAI SANGDA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
Order
The court convicted the accused under the Gujarat Prohibition Act for illegal possession of liquor without a permit. The accused voluntarily confessed to the charges, and considering his poor financial condition, first-time offense, and family responsibilities, the court imposed a lenient sentence of imprisonment up to court appearance and a fine of Rs. 200, along with an alternative simple imprisonment of 5 days if the fine remains unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
06-Mar-2026
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
13-Feb-2026
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
20-Jan-2026
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
19-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
17-Oct-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 4241/2025
The court convicted the accused under the Gujarat Prohibition Act for illegal possession of liquor without a permit. The accused voluntarily confessed to the charges, and considering his poor financial condition, first-time offense, and family responsibilities, the court imposed a lenient sentence of imprisonment up to court appearance and a fine of Rs. 200, along with an alternative simple imprisonment of 5 days if the fine remains unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts