Government of Gujarat vs RATUBEN SURPALBHAI SANGADA — 4223/2025
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJDH050049272025
Filing Number
4222/2025
Filing Date
16-Oct-2025
Registration No
4223/2025
Registration Date
16-Oct-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, JHALOD
Judge
3-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
Last updated 16-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.RATUBEN SURPALBHAI SANGADA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
Order
SUMMARY: The court convicted the accused under the Gujarat Prohibition Act for illegal possession of liquor without a permit. The accused pleaded guilty, and the court accepted the confession as voluntary. Considering the accused's first-time offense, poor economic circumstances, and family dependence, the court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 200/- fine and 5 days imprisonment under Section 264 IPC, along with a fine of Rs. 2000/- in lieu of additional imprisonment, citing special and reasonable grounds to impose less than the minimum statutory punishment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
06-Mar-2026
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
05-Mar-2026
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
07-Feb-2026
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
16-Jan-2026
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
17-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
16-Oct-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 4223/2025
SUMMARY: The court convicted the accused under the Gujarat Prohibition Act for illegal possession of liquor without a permit. The accused pleaded guilty, and the court accepted the confession as voluntary. Considering the accused's first-time offense, poor economic circumstances, and family dependence, the court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 200/- fine and 5 days imprisonment under Section 264 IPC, along with a fine of Rs. 2000/- in lieu of additional imprisonment, citing special and reasonable grounds to impose less than the minimum statutory punishment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts