Government of Gujarat vs ANKITBHAI SAGUBHAI MEDA — 3532/2025
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJDH050040882025
Filing Number
3532/2025
Filing Date
30-Aug-2025
Registration No
3532/2025
Registration Date
30-Aug-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, JHALOD
Judge
3-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
Last updated 16-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.ANKITBHAI SAGUBHAI MEDA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
Order
The court convicted the accused Ankitbhai Sagubhai Meda under sections 5(A) and 5(A) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act for illegal possession of liquor without a valid permit. Considering the accused's voluntary guilty plea, impoverished circumstances, and status as the sole earning member with dependents, the court imposed a lenient sentence of simple imprisonment for 5 days and a fine of Rs. 200, rather than the statutory minimum punishment, citing reasonable and special grounds for mitigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
06-Mar-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
21-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
31-Jan-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
12-Dec-2025
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
20-Nov-2025
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
29-Oct-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
30-Aug-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 3532/2025
The court convicted the accused Ankitbhai Sagubhai Meda under sections 5(A) and 5(A) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act for illegal possession of liquor without a valid permit. Considering the accused's voluntary guilty plea, impoverished circumstances, and status as the sole earning member with dependents, the court imposed a lenient sentence of simple imprisonment for 5 days and a fine of Rs. 200, rather than the statutory minimum punishment, citing reasonable and special grounds for mitigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts