Government of Gujarat vs KALPESHBHAI MALABHAI BHABHOR — 612/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 85,66(1)B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJDH050006882026

Filing Number

612/2026

Filing Date

03-Feb-2026

Registration No

612/2026

Registration Date

03-Feb-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, JHALOD

Judge

3-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 16-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 85,66(1)B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.KALPESHBHAI MALABHAI BHABHOR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order

    The court convicted the accused under Section 55(1)(bi) of the Gujarat Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act for possessing and consuming drugs in a public place without proper permission. However, considering the accused's poor socioeconomic background, first-time offense, and family responsibilities, the court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 200 fine and 5 days imprisonment instead of the maximum prescribed punishment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  5. 03-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  6. 27-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 03-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 612/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted the accused under Section 55(1)(bi) of the Gujarat Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act for possessing and consuming drugs in a public place without proper permission. However, considering the accused's poor socioeconomic background, first-time offense, and family responsibilities, the court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 200 fine and 5 days imprisonment instead of the maximum prescribed punishment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case