Government of Gujarat vs ISHWARBHAI SANGABHAI GARASIYA — 471/2026

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 185. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJDH050005422026

Filing Number

471/2026

Filing Date

30-Jan-2026

Registration No

471/2026

Registration Date

30-Jan-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, JHALOD

Judge

3-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 16-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 185
Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ISHWARBHAI SANGABHAI GARASIYA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court convicted the accused under IPC Section 185 (driving without a license) and MV Act Section 66(1)(b), accepting his guilty plea. Considering the accused's economic circumstances as a poor laborer and sole breadwinner of his family, the court imposed a fine of Rs. 2,000 (or 10 days imprisonment in default) rather than maximum punishment, showing judicial discretion and leniency. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  5. 28-Feb-2026

    Process To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  6. 25-Feb-2026

    Process To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  7. 04-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 30-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 471/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted the accused under IPC Section 185 (driving without a license) and MV Act Section 66(1)(b), accepting his guilty plea. Considering the accused's economic circumstances as a poor laborer and sole breadwinner of his family, the court imposed a fine of Rs. 2,000 (or 10 days imprisonment in default) rather than maximum punishment, showing judicial discretion and leniency. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case