Government of Gujarat vs ARPITBHAI PRAKASHBHAI DODIYAR — 352/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJDH050003962026

Filing Number

352/2026

Filing Date

16-Jan-2026

Registration No

352/2026

Registration Date

16-Jan-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, JHALOD

Judge

3-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 16-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ARPITBHAI PRAKASHBHAI DODIYAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order

    Case Summary The court found the accused guilty of illegal liquor possession under the Gujarat Prohibition Act and convicted him after he voluntarily pleaded guilty. Considering the accused's poor economic condition, first-time offense, and family responsibilities as special circumstances, the court sentenced him to the minimum punishment of Rs. 200 fine under IPC Section 264, along with simple imprisonment for 5 days, departing from the standard sentencing guidelines to show leniency. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  5. 16-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  6. 11-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 16-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 352/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The court found the accused guilty of illegal liquor possession under the Gujarat Prohibition Act and convicted him after he voluntarily pleaded guilty. Considering the accused's poor economic condition, first-time offense, and family responsibilities as special circumstances, the court sentenced him to the minimum punishment of Rs. 200 fine under IPC Section 264, along with simple imprisonment for 5 days, departing from the standard sentencing guidelines to show leniency. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case