Government of Gujarat vs KALPESHBHAI NATHUBHAI GARASIYA — 345/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJDH050003892026

Filing Number

345/2026

Filing Date

16-Jan-2026

Registration No

345/2026

Registration Date

16-Jan-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, JHALOD

Judge

3-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 16-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.KALPESHBHAI NATHUBHAI GARASIYA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order

    The court convicted the accused Kalpeshbhai Nathubhai Garasiya under the Gujarat Prohibition Act for illegal possession of liquor without a permit. The accused pleaded guilty and the court accepted his voluntary confession, finding him guilty of the offense. Considering the accused's impoverished condition, family responsibilities, and reliance on guidance from precedent law, the court imposed a lenient sentence of imprisonment up to court's discretion and a fine of Rs. 200, with an alternative simple imprisonment of 5 days if the fine remained unpaid, along with seizure of case materials. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  5. 16-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  6. 11-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 16-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 345/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted the accused Kalpeshbhai Nathubhai Garasiya under the Gujarat Prohibition Act for illegal possession of liquor without a permit. The accused pleaded guilty and the court accepted his voluntary confession, finding him guilty of the offense. Considering the accused's impoverished condition, family responsibilities, and reliance on guidance from precedent law, the court imposed a lenient sentence of imprisonment up to court's discretion and a fine of Rs. 200, with an alternative simple imprisonment of 5 days if the fine remained unpaid, along with seizure of case materials. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case