Government of Gujarat vs KALPESHBHAI NATHUBHAI GARASIYA — 345/2026

Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA,. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJDH050003892026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

345/2026

Filing Date

16-01-2026

Registration No

345/2026

Registration Date

16-01-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, JHALOD

Judge

3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Acts & Sections

GUJARAT (BOMBAY) PROHIBITION ACT, 1949 Section 65AA,

Petitioner(s)

Government of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

KALPESHBHAI NATHUBHAI GARASIYA

Hearing History

Judge: 3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM

14-03-2026

Disposed

06-03-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

16-02-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

11-02-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
ORDER

The court convicted the accused Kalpeshbhai Nathubhai Garasiya under the Gujarat Prohibition Act for illegal possession of liquor without a permit. The accused pleaded guilty and the court accepted his voluntary confession, finding him guilty of the offense. Considering the accused's impoverished condition, family responsibilities, and reliance on guidance from precedent law, the court imposed a lenient sentence of imprisonment up to court's discretion and a fine of Rs. 200, with an alternative simple imprisonment of 5 days if the fine remained unpaid, along with seizure of case materials. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted the accused Kalpeshbhai Nathubhai Garasiya under the Gujarat Prohibition Act for illegal possession of liquor without a permit. The accused pleaded guilty and the court accepted his voluntary confession, finding him guilty of the offense. Considering the accused's impoverished condition, family responsibilities, and reliance on guidance from precedent law, the court imposed a lenient sentence of imprisonment up to court's discretion and a fine of Rs. 200, with an alternative simple imprisonment of 5 days if the fine remained unpaid, along with seizure of case materials. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, JHALOD All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case