Government of Gujarat vs RAJUBHAI RAMANLAL VASAIYA — 283/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJDH050003242026

Filing Number

283/2026

Filing Date

13-Jan-2026

Registration No

283/2026

Registration Date

13-Jan-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, JHALOD

Judge

3-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 16-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAJUBHAI RAMANLAL VASAIYA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order

    The court found the accused guilty of illegally possessing alcohol without a permit under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, sections 65(A) and 5. The accused pleaded guilty voluntarily, and the court, considering his poor economic condition, first-time offense, and family responsibilities, sentenced him to imprisonment up to court discretion and a fine of ₹200, with an alternative of 5 days simple imprisonment if the fine is not paid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  6. 16-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  7. 11-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 13-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 283/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court found the accused guilty of illegally possessing alcohol without a permit under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, sections 65(A) and 5. The accused pleaded guilty voluntarily, and the court, considering his poor economic condition, first-time offense, and family responsibilities, sentenced him to imprisonment up to court discretion and a fine of ₹200, with an alternative of 5 days simple imprisonment if the fine is not paid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case