BHURIYA KANESHBHAI KHUMSINGBHAI vs BARIYA YOGINABEN INESHBHAI — 13/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 100. Disposed: Uncontested--REJECTED on 23rd April 2026.
CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC
CNR: GJDH050002632026
Filing Number
13/2026
Filing Date
12-Jan-2026
Registration No
13/2026
Registration Date
12-Jan-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, JHALOD
Judge
1-Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
23-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--REJECTED
Last updated 22-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.BHURIYA KANESHBHAI KHUMSINGBHAI
Adv. P S PARIK
Respondent(s)
-
1.BARIYA YOGINABEN INESHBHAI
-
2.BARIYA INESHBHAI DINESHBHAI
-
3.HATHILA NILESHBHAI V
-
4.HATHILA SAVITABEN NILESHBHAI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
23-Apr-2026
OrderView PDF
The court dismissed the petition filed by Bhuriya Kaneshbhai Khumsingbhai regarding matrimonial matters. The court found that the petitioner's claims lacked factual basis, as the respondent (Bariya Yoginaben) had not willingly accompanied the petitioner and her parents did not compel her to do so, contrary to the petitioner's allegations of bigamy and forced separation during marriage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
23-Apr-2026
Disposed
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
02-Apr-2026
Reply
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
24-Mar-2026
Reply
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
18-Mar-2026
Process To Opponent
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
28-Feb-2026
Process To Opponent
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
12-Feb-2026
Process To Opponent
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
27-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 13/2026
The court dismissed the petition filed by Bhuriya Kaneshbhai Khumsingbhai regarding matrimonial matters. The court found that the petitioner's claims lacked factual basis, as the respondent (Bariya Yoginaben) had not willingly accompanied the petitioner and her parents did not compel her to do so, contrary to the petitioner's allegations of bigamy and forced separation during marriage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts