Government of Gujarat vs GOPALBHAI BALVANTBHAI VANJHARA Advocate - S M MACHHAR — 117/2026

Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 85,66(1)B,. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJDH050001472026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

117/2026

Filing Date

07-01-2026

Registration No

117/2026

Registration Date

07-01-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, JHALOD

Judge

1-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Acts & Sections

GUJARAT (BOMBAY) PROHIBITION ACT, 1949 Section 85,66(1)B,

Petitioner(s)

Government of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

GOPALBHAI BALVANTBHAI VANJHARA Advocate - S M MACHHAR

Hearing History

Judge: 1-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.

14-03-2026

Disposed

06-03-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

05-02-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
ORDER

The court convicted the accused under the Gujarat Prohibition Act for possessing and consuming alcohol without permission, and accepted the accused's voluntary confession of guilt. Considering the accused's poor economic circumstances, family situation, and the principle established in State of Gujarat v. Natwar Harchandji that lesser punishment may be imposed when sufficient and justified reasons exist, the court sentenced the accused to imprisonment up to the date of this order and imposed a fine of Rs. 100, with one day of simple imprisonment as an alternative if the fine remains unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted the accused under the Gujarat Prohibition Act for possessing and consuming alcohol without permission, and accepted the accused's voluntary confession of guilt. Considering the accused's poor economic circumstances, family situation, and the principle established in State of Gujarat v. Natwar Harchandji that lesser punishment may be imposed when sufficient and justified reasons exist, the court sentenced the accused to imprisonment up to the date of this order and imposed a fine of Rs. 100, with one day of simple imprisonment as an alternative if the fine remains unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, JHALOD All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case