Government of Gujarat vs GOPALBHAI BALVANTBHAI VANJHARA Advocate - S M MACHHAR — 117/2026
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 85,66(1)B,. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJDH050001472026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
117/2026
Filing Date
07-01-2026
Registration No
117/2026
Registration Date
07-01-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, JHALOD
Judge
1-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
GOPALBHAI BALVANTBHAI VANJHARA Advocate - S M MACHHAR
Hearing History
Judge: 1-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Disposed
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 06-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 05-02-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court convicted the accused under the Gujarat Prohibition Act for possessing and consuming alcohol without permission, and accepted the accused's voluntary confession of guilt. Considering the accused's poor economic circumstances, family situation, and the principle established in State of Gujarat v. Natwar Harchandji that lesser punishment may be imposed when sufficient and justified reasons exist, the court sentenced the accused to imprisonment up to the date of this order and imposed a fine of Rs. 100, with one day of simple imprisonment as an alternative if the fine remains unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court convicted the accused under the Gujarat Prohibition Act for possessing and consuming alcohol without permission, and accepted the accused's voluntary confession of guilt. Considering the accused's poor economic circumstances, family situation, and the principle established in State of Gujarat v. Natwar Harchandji that lesser punishment may be imposed when sufficient and justified reasons exist, the court sentenced the accused to imprisonment up to the date of this order and imposed a fine of Rs. 100, with one day of simple imprisonment as an alternative if the fine remains unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts