Government of Gujarat vs RAMESHBHAI JETABHAI SOLANKI Advocate - A L BHABHOR — 110/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJDH050001402026

Filing Number

110/2026

Filing Date

07-Jan-2026

Registration No

110/2026

Registration Date

07-Jan-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, JHALOD

Judge

1-Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 16-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAMESHBHAI JETABHAI SOLANKI Advocate - A L BHABHOR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order

    Summary The court convicted the accused under Section 65(A) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act for unlawfully possessing and concealing liquor, finding the police investigation and charges credible. However, recognizing the accused's poor financial circumstances, first-time offense, and family dependence, the court exercised discretionary powers to impose a reduced sentence of Rs. 100 as a fine (instead of the mandatory minimum) and one day imprisonment, along with destruction of the seized contraband. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  5. 05-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 07-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 110/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court convicted the accused under Section 65(A) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act for unlawfully possessing and concealing liquor, finding the police investigation and charges credible. However, recognizing the accused's poor financial circumstances, first-time offense, and family dependence, the court exercised discretionary powers to impose a reduced sentence of Rs. 100 as a fine (instead of the mandatory minimum) and one day imprisonment, along with destruction of the seized contraband. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case