Government of Gujarat vs SOMABHAI URFE BABUBHAI HEMATABHAI HARIJAN Advocate - D D BHARWAD — 1488/2024

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279,337,338. Disposed: Contested--JUDGEMENT on 02nd April 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJDH040018592024

Filing Number

1488/2024

Filing Date

25-Sep-2024

Registration No

1488/2024

Registration Date

25-Sep-2024

Court

TALUKA COURT, LIMKHEDA

Judge

1-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge &

Decision Date

02-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGEMENT

Last updated 22-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11821035240595

Police Station

LIMKHEDA POLICE STATION - DAHOD DISTRICT

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 279,337,338
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 177,184,134,3,181

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SOMABHAI URFE BABUBHAI HEMATABHAI HARIJAN Advocate - D D BHARWAD

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 02-Apr-2026

    Judegement

    Case Summary: 1488/2024 Court Decision: The accused, Somabhai (also known as Babubhai) Hematabhai Harijan, was acquitted of all charges under IPC sections 279, 337, 338 and MV Act sections 177, 184, 134, 3, 181. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. Key Reasoning: Despite witness testimony about a vehicle collision on May 27, 2024, the prosecution could not establish that the accused was negligently driving the vehicle or that his rash driving caused the accident. Critical evidence regarding vehicle speed, driver identity at time of accident, and the accused's alleged reckless conduct remained unproven. The court noted insufficient corroboration of key facts necessary to establish the traffic violation charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 02-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge &

  4. 18-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge &

  5. 21-Feb-2026

    Warrant Of Arrest

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge &

  6. 30-Jan-2026

    Warrant Of Arrest

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge &

  7. 08-Jan-2026

    Judgement

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge &

  8. 23-Dec-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge &

  9. 08-Dec-2025

    Further Statement

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge &

  10. 20-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge &

  11. 17-Nov-2025

    Plea

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge &

  12. 04-Nov-2025

    Plea

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge &

  13. 30-Sep-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge &

  14. 02-Sep-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge &

  15. 05-Aug-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge &

  16. 29-Jul-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge &

  17. 08-Jul-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge &

  18. 10-Jun-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge &

  19. 13-May-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge &

  20. 22-Apr-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge &

  21. 25-Mar-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge &

  22. 18-Feb-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge &

  23. 28-Jan-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge &

  24. 13-Jan-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge &

  25. 23-Dec-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge &

  26. 02-Dec-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge &

  27. 16-Nov-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge &

  28. 19-Oct-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  29. 25-Sep-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1488/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 1488/2024 Court Decision: The accused, Somabhai (also known as Babubhai) Hematabhai Harijan, was acquitted of all charges under IPC sections 279, 337, 338 and MV Act sections 177, 184, 134, 3, 181. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. Key Reasoning: Despite witness testimony about a vehicle collision on May 27, 2024, the prosecution could not establish that the accused was negligently driving the vehicle or that his rash driving caused the accident. Critical evidence regarding vehicle speed, driver identity at time of accident, and the accused's alleged reckless conduct remained unproven. The court noted insufficient corroboration of key facts necessary to establish the traffic violation charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case