VICHHUDABHAI URFE VICHHIYABHAI HEMABHAI CHAUHAN(Legal Heir) vs GOBARBHAI BHATALBHAI CHAUHAN Advocate - M B PATEL — 10/2023
Case under Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 34. Status: Plaintiff Evidence. Next hearing: 02nd April 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJDH040014182023
Filing Number
10/2023
Filing Date
18-Jul-2023
Registration No
10/2023
Registration Date
18-Jul-2023
Court
TALUKA COURT, LIMKHEDA
Judge
1-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge &
Last updated 16-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.VICHHUDABHAI URFE VICHHIYABHAI HEMABHAI CHAUHAN(Legal Heir)
Adv. S J SONI1.
-
2.BHEMABHAI VICHHIYABHAI CHAUHAN(Legal Heir)
Adv. S J SONI1.1.
-
3.GULIBEN BHEMABHAI CHAUHAN
Adv. S J SONI1.1.
-
4.JASUBHAI BHEMABHAI CHAUHAN
Adv. S J SONI1.1.
-
5.KASANIBEN BHEMABHAI VICHHIYABHAI CHAUHAN
Adv. S J SONI1.1.
-
6.SAVITABEN BHEMABHAI VICHHIYABHAI CHAUHAN
Adv. S J SONI1.1.
-
7.KANTABEN BHEMABHAI VICHHIYABHAI CHAUHAN
Adv. S J SONI1.1.
-
8.SONIBEN BHEMABHAI VICHHIYABHAI CHAUHAN
Adv. S J SONI1.1.
-
9.SURATIBEN BHEMABHAI VICHHIYABHAI CHAUHAN
Adv. S J SONI1.
-
10.MATHURBHAI BHEMABHAI CHAUHAN(Legal Heir)
Adv. S J SONI1.2.
-
11.SHANTABEN MATHURBHAI CHAUHAN
Adv. S J SONI1.2.
-
12.HIRABHAI MATHURBHAI CHAUHAN
Adv. S J SONI1.2.
-
13.DINESHBHAI MATHURBHAI CHAUHAN
Adv. S J SONI1.2.
-
14.REKHABEN MATHURBHAI BHEMABHAI CHAUHAN
Adv. S J SONI1.2.
-
15.NAYANABEN MATHURBHAI BHEMABHAI CHAUHAN
Adv. S J SONI1.
-
16.NAVALSING VICHHIYABHAI CHAUHAN
Adv. S J SONI1.
-
17.NARSINGBHAI VICHHIYABHAI CHAUHAN
Adv. S J SONI1.
-
18.RAMSINGBHAI VICHHIYABHAI CHAUHAN
Adv. S J SONI1.
-
19.JOKHANIBEN VICHHIYABHAI HEMABHAI CHAUHAN
Adv. S J SONI1.
-
20.BALIBEN VICHHIYABEN HEMABHAI CHAUHAN
Adv. S J SONI
Respondent(s)
-
1.GOBARBHAI BHATALBHAI CHAUHAN Advocate - M B PATEL
-
2.GITABEN D/O MANSUKHBHAI BHATALABHAI CHAUHAN
Case History
-
02-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
06-Mar-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge &
-
13-Feb-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge &
-
22-Jan-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge &
-
26-Dec-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge &
-
06-Dec-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge &
-
13-Nov-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge &
-
16-Oct-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge &
-
03-Oct-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge &
-
20-Sep-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge &
-
06-Sep-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge &
-
14-Aug-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge &
-
31-Jul-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge &
-
10-Jul-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge &
-
12-Jun-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge &
-
01-May-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge &
-
05-Apr-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge &
-
20-Mar-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge &
-
27-Feb-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge &
-
06-Feb-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge &
-
16-Jan-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge &
-
19-Dec-2024
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge &
-
28-Nov-2024
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge &
-
07-Nov-2024
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge &
-
10-Oct-2024
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge &
-
19-Sep-2024
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge &
-
23-Aug-2024
Order
Court Order Summary Case: R.C.S.NO.10/2023 (Gujarat High Court) Outcome: The petition is ALLOWED IN PART. The court granted the plaintiff's relief to declare him as the sole owner and possessor of the disputed agricultural land. However, the court rejected the plaintiff's prayer for a decree of possession and directed that pending the final resolution of the case, the defendants are restrained from interfering with the plaintiff's agricultural land. The court also issued a declaration that Entry No. 216 in the revenue record, which was cancelled, should remain cancelled, confirming the plaintiff's ownership rights over the property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
23-Aug-2024
Order On Injuction Application
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge &
-
02-Aug-2024
Order On Injuction Application
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge &
-
18-Jul-2024
Hearing On Injunction Application
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge &
-
04-Jul-2024
Hearing On Injunction Application
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge &
-
13-Jun-2024
Hearing On Injunction Application
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge &
-
09-May-2024
Hearing On Injunction Application
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge &
-
03-May-2024
Hearing On Injunction Application
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge &
-
19-Apr-2024
Hearing On Injunction Application
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge &
-
29-Mar-2024
Hearing On Injunction Application
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge &
-
14-Mar-2024
Hearing On Injunction Application
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge &
-
15-Feb-2024
For Counter Affidavit
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge &
-
19-Jan-2024
Reply To Counter Claim
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge &
-
21-Dec-2023
Reply To Counter Claim
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge &
-
30-Nov-2023
Reply To Counter Claim
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge &
-
09-Nov-2023
Reply To Counter Claim
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge &
-
20-Oct-2023
Reply To Counter Claim
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge &
-
15-Sep-2023
Written Statement/Reply
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge &
-
24-Aug-2023
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge &
-
04-Aug-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Jul-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 10/2023
Court Order Summary Case: R.C.S.NO.10/2023 (Gujarat High Court) Outcome: The petition is ALLOWED IN PART. The court granted the plaintiff's relief to declare him as the sole owner and possessor of the disputed agricultural land. However, the court rejected the plaintiff's prayer for a decree of possession and directed that pending the final resolution of the case, the defendants are restrained from interfering with the plaintiff's agricultural land. The court also issued a declaration that Entry No. 216 in the revenue record, which was cancelled, should remain cancelled, confirming the plaintiff's ownership rights over the property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts