Government of Gujarat vs MUKESHBHAI LALCHANDBHAI MAVI — 1098/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJDH040011602026

Filing Number

1098/2026

Filing Date

16-Feb-2026

Registration No

1098/2026

Registration Date

16-Feb-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, LIMKHEDA

Judge

1-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge &

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 03-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11821035250964

Police Station

LIMKHEDA POLICE STATION - DAHOD DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MUKESHBHAI LALCHANDBHAI MAVI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Order

    The court convicted Mukeshbhai Lalchandbhai Mali under Section 6(p) of the Prohibition Act based on his voluntary confession, sentencing him to pay a fine of ₹400 or serve 2 days simple imprisonment in the alternative. The court accepted the accused's voluntary plea of guilt after verifying that he was fully informed of the consequences and that his confession was made without coercion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge &

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    Summons - Notice

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge &

  6. 16-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 16-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1098/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted Mukeshbhai Lalchandbhai Mali under Section 6(p) of the Prohibition Act based on his voluntary confession, sentencing him to pay a fine of ₹400 or serve 2 days simple imprisonment in the alternative. The court accepted the accused's voluntary plea of guilt after verifying that he was fully informed of the consequences and that his confession was made without coercion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case