Government of Gujarat vs MANHARBHAI LAXMANBHAI CHAUHAN — 1094/2026
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 85,66(1)(B),. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJDH040011562026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1094/2026
Filing Date
16-02-2026
Registration No
1094/2026
Registration Date
16-02-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, LIMKHEDA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE &
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISPOSED OF
FIR Details
FIR Number
11821035251365
Police Station
LIMKHEDA POLICE STATION - DAHOD DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
MANHARBHAI LAXMANBHAI CHAUHAN
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE &
Disposed
SUMMONS - NOTICE
SUMMONS - NOTICE
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 07-03-2026 | SUMMONS - NOTICE | |
| 16-02-2026 | SUMMONS - NOTICE |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: The court discharged the accused under the Bombay Prohibition Act Section 66(1)(b) for consuming liquor without a permit in a public place. The court found that critical procedural requirements were not satisfied: no blood test report was submitted despite being mandatory under the Prohibition (Medical Examination and Blood Test) Rules 1959, and the blood sample was not forwarded to the FSL within the mandatory seven-day period. Additionally, no evidence of public nuisance or disorderly conduct was established on record, making the prosecution's case insufficient to prove the charge beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The court discharged the accused under the Bombay Prohibition Act Section 66(1)(b) for consuming liquor without a permit in a public place. The court found that critical procedural requirements were not satisfied: no blood test report was submitted despite being mandatory under the Prohibition (Medical Examination and Blood Test) Rules 1959, and the blood sample was not forwarded to the FSL within the mandatory seven-day period. Additionally, no evidence of public nuisance or disorderly conduct was established on record, making the prosecution's case insufficient to prove the charge beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts