Government of Gujarat vs SARTANBHAI BHIKHABHAI MAVI — 1093/2026

Summary The court discharged the accused from charges under the Prohibition Act, Section 66(1)(b) for consuming liquor without a permit. The court found that the prosecution failed to provide mandatory evidence, specifically: (1) no blood test report was submitted to establish alcohol content above the legal limit of 0.05%, and (2) no proof that the blood sample reached the FSL within the mandatory 7-day period as required by the Bombay Prohibition (Medical Examination and Blood Test) Rules, 1959. Without this essential forensic evidence, the court concluded the charge could not be substantiated and ordered the accused's discharge. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.