Government of Gujarat vs SARDARBHAI SURTANBHAI KATARA — 1060/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 85,66(1)(B). Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJDH040011182026

Filing Number

1060/2026

Filing Date

13-Feb-2026

Registration No

1060/2026

Registration Date

13-Feb-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, LIMKHEDA

Judge

1-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge &

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 03-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11821035250538

Police Station

LIMKHEDA POLICE STATION - DAHOD DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 85,66(1)(B)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SARDARBHAI SURTANBHAI KATARA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary The court discharged the accused under Section 66(1)(b) of the Prohibition Act due to insufficient evidence. The prosecution failed to produce a mandatory blood test report showing alcohol content exceeding the legal limit of 0.05%, and failed to prove that the blood sample was sent to the forensic laboratory within the mandatory 7-day period as required by the Bombay Prohibition (Medical Examination and Blood Test) Rules, 1959. Additionally, no evidence was presented establishing the key elements of the offense such as public nuisance or disorderly conduct. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge &

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    Warrant Of Arrest

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge &

  5. 13-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 13-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1060/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The court discharged the accused under Section 66(1)(b) of the Prohibition Act due to insufficient evidence. The prosecution failed to produce a mandatory blood test report showing alcohol content exceeding the legal limit of 0.05%, and failed to prove that the blood sample was sent to the forensic laboratory within the mandatory 7-day period as required by the Bombay Prohibition (Medical Examination and Blood Test) Rules, 1959. Additionally, no evidence was presented establishing the key elements of the offense such as public nuisance or disorderly conduct. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case