Government of Gujarat vs KANTIBHAI PARVATBHAI VADI — 1030/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 85,66(1)(B). Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJDH040010872026

Filing Number

1030/2026

Filing Date

12-Feb-2026

Registration No

1030/2026

Registration Date

12-Feb-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, LIMKHEDA

Judge

1-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge &

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 16-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 85,66(1)(B)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.KANTIBHAI PARVATBHAI VADI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Order

    SUMMARY: The court discharged the accused under the Prohibition Act Section 66(1)(b) for alleged public consumption of alcohol without a permit. The court found that the prosecution failed to submit mandatory blood test reports as required under the Bombay Prohibition Medical Examination and Blood Test Rules, 1959, and did not establish the statutory alcohol content threshold in the accused's blood within the required seven-day period. Additionally, the court noted the absence of evidence regarding disorderly conduct or public disturbance required to constitute the offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge &

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    Warrant Of Arrest

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge &

  6. 12-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 12-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1030/2026

casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY: The court discharged the accused under the Prohibition Act Section 66(1)(b) for alleged public consumption of alcohol without a permit. The court found that the prosecution failed to submit mandatory blood test reports as required under the Bombay Prohibition Medical Examination and Blood Test Rules, 1959, and did not establish the statutory alcohol content threshold in the accused's blood within the required seven-day period. Additionally, the court noted the absence of evidence regarding disorderly conduct or public disturbance required to constitute the offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case