Government of Gujarat vs KANTIBHAI PARVATBHAI VADI — 1030/2026
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 85,66(1)(B),. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJDH040010872026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1030/2026
Filing Date
12-02-2026
Registration No
1030/2026
Registration Date
12-02-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, LIMKHEDA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE &
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISPOSED OF
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
KANTIBHAI PARVATBHAI VADI
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE &
Disposed
WARRANT OF ARREST
SUMMONS - NOTICE
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 06-03-2026 | WARRANT OF ARREST | |
| 12-02-2026 | SUMMONS - NOTICE |
Final Orders / Judgements
SUMMARY: The court discharged the accused under the Prohibition Act Section 66(1)(b) for alleged public consumption of alcohol without a permit. The court found that the prosecution failed to submit mandatory blood test reports as required under the Bombay Prohibition Medical Examination and Blood Test Rules, 1959, and did not establish the statutory alcohol content threshold in the accused's blood within the required seven-day period. Additionally, the court noted the absence of evidence regarding disorderly conduct or public disturbance required to constitute the offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
SUMMARY: The court discharged the accused under the Prohibition Act Section 66(1)(b) for alleged public consumption of alcohol without a permit. The court found that the prosecution failed to submit mandatory blood test reports as required under the Bombay Prohibition Medical Examination and Blood Test Rules, 1959, and did not establish the statutory alcohol content threshold in the accused's blood within the required seven-day period. Additionally, the court noted the absence of evidence regarding disorderly conduct or public disturbance required to constitute the offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts