Government of Gujarat vs GOVINDBHAI CHAGANBHAI BAMANIYA — 1007/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 85,66(1)(B). Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJDH040010622026

Filing Number

1007/2026

Filing Date

11-Feb-2026

Registration No

1007/2026

Registration Date

11-Feb-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, LIMKHEDA

Judge

1-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge &

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 16-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 85,66(1)(B)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.GOVINDBHAI CHAGANBHAI BAMANIYA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order

    Summary The court discharged the accused under Section 66(1)(b) of the Prohibition Act due to insufficient evidence. The prosecution failed to submit a mandatory blood test report required by the Bombay Prohibition (Medical Examination and Blood Test) Rules, 1959, and could not prove that the blood sample reached the FSL within seven days of collection. Without this critical evidence establishing alcohol content above the legal limit, the court found no prima facie case and ordered the accused's acquittal and cancellation of bail bonds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge &

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    Warrant Of Arrest

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge &

  5. 11-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 11-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1007/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court discharged the accused under Section 66(1)(b) of the Prohibition Act due to insufficient evidence. The prosecution failed to submit a mandatory blood test report required by the Bombay Prohibition (Medical Examination and Blood Test) Rules, 1959, and could not prove that the blood sample reached the FSL within seven days of collection. Without this critical evidence establishing alcohol content above the legal limit, the court found no prima facie case and ordered the accused's acquittal and cancellation of bail bonds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case