Government of Gujarat vs GOVINDBHAI CHAGANBHAI BAMANIYA — 1007/2026
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 85,66(1)(B),. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJDH040010622026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1007/2026
Filing Date
11-02-2026
Registration No
1007/2026
Registration Date
11-02-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, LIMKHEDA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE &
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISPOSED OF
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
GOVINDBHAI CHAGANBHAI BAMANIYA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE &
Disposed
WARRANT OF ARREST
SUMMONS - NOTICE
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 06-03-2026 | WARRANT OF ARREST | |
| 11-02-2026 | SUMMONS - NOTICE |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court discharged the accused under Section 66(1)(b) of the Prohibition Act due to insufficient evidence. The prosecution failed to submit a mandatory blood test report required by the Bombay Prohibition (Medical Examination and Blood Test) Rules, 1959, and could not prove that the blood sample reached the FSL within seven days of collection. Without this critical evidence establishing alcohol content above the legal limit, the court found no prima facie case and ordered the accused's acquittal and cancellation of bail bonds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court discharged the accused under Section 66(1)(b) of the Prohibition Act due to insufficient evidence. The prosecution failed to submit a mandatory blood test report required by the Bombay Prohibition (Medical Examination and Blood Test) Rules, 1959, and could not prove that the blood sample reached the FSL within seven days of collection. Without this critical evidence establishing alcohol content above the legal limit, the court found no prima facie case and ordered the accused's acquittal and cancellation of bail bonds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts