Government of Gujarat vs VINODBHAI BHURSINGBHAI SANGADA — 1003/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 85,66(1)(B). Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJDH040010582026

Filing Number

1003/2026

Filing Date

11-Feb-2026

Registration No

1003/2026

Registration Date

11-Feb-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, LIMKHEDA

Judge

1-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge &

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 16-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 85,66(1)(B)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.VINODBHAI BHURSINGBHAI SANGADA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order

    Summary The court discharged the accused from charges under the Bombay Prohibition Act, Section 66(1)(b) for consuming liquor without a permit in a public place. The court found that the prosecution failed to produce mandatory medical evidence—specifically a blood test report forwarding it to FSL within seven days as required by the Prohibition Medical Examination and Blood Test Rules, 1959—making it impossible to prove the alcohol level exceeded legal limits. Additionally, the charge sheet lacked evidence of disorderly conduct, rendering the prima facie case insufficient. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge &

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    Summons - Notice

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge &

  5. 11-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 11-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1003/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court discharged the accused from charges under the Bombay Prohibition Act, Section 66(1)(b) for consuming liquor without a permit in a public place. The court found that the prosecution failed to produce mandatory medical evidence—specifically a blood test report forwarding it to FSL within seven days as required by the Prohibition Medical Examination and Blood Test Rules, 1959—making it impossible to prove the alcohol level exceeded legal limits. Additionally, the charge sheet lacked evidence of disorderly conduct, rendering the prima facie case insufficient. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case