Government of Gujarat vs VINODBHAI BHURSINGBHAI SANGADA — 1003/2026

Summary The court discharged the accused from charges under the Bombay Prohibition Act, Section 66(1)(b) for consuming liquor without a permit in a public place. The court found that the prosecution failed to produce mandatory medical evidence—specifically a blood test report forwarding it to FSL within seven days as required by the Prohibition Medical Examination and Blood Test Rules, 1959—making it impossible to prove the alcohol level exceeded legal limits. Additionally, the charge sheet lacked evidence of disorderly conduct, rendering the prima facie case insufficient. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.