Government of Gujarat vs POPATBHAI KALABHAI PARMAR — 1001/2026
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 85,66(1)(B),. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJDH040010562026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1001/2026
Filing Date
11-02-2026
Registration No
1001/2026
Registration Date
11-02-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, LIMKHEDA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE &
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISPOSED OF
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
POPATBHAI KALABHAI PARMAR
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE &
Disposed
SUMMONS - NOTICE
SUMMONS - NOTICE
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 06-03-2026 | SUMMONS - NOTICE | |
| 11-02-2026 | SUMMONS - NOTICE |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court discharged the accused from charges under the Prohibition Act Section 66(1)(b) for consuming alcohol without a permit in public. The court found that mandatory medical and blood test procedures were not followed as required under the Bombay Prohibition (Medical Examination and Blood Test) Rules, 1959—specifically, no blood test report was submitted and no evidence proved alcohol levels exceeded legal limits. Additionally, the court noted the chargesheet lacked evidence of public disturbance or criminal behavior required for conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court discharged the accused from charges under the Prohibition Act Section 66(1)(b) for consuming alcohol without a permit in public. The court found that mandatory medical and blood test procedures were not followed as required under the Bombay Prohibition (Medical Examination and Blood Test) Rules, 1959—specifically, no blood test report was submitted and no evidence proved alcohol levels exceeded legal limits. Additionally, the court noted the chargesheet lacked evidence of public disturbance or criminal behavior required for conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts