Government of Gujarat vs POPATBHAI KALABHAI PARMAR — 1001/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 85,66(1)(B). Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJDH040010562026

Filing Number

1001/2026

Filing Date

11-Feb-2026

Registration No

1001/2026

Registration Date

11-Feb-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, LIMKHEDA

Judge

1-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge &

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 16-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 85,66(1)(B)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.POPATBHAI KALABHAI PARMAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court discharged the accused from charges under the Prohibition Act Section 66(1)(b) for consuming alcohol without a permit in public. The court found that mandatory medical and blood test procedures were not followed as required under the Bombay Prohibition (Medical Examination and Blood Test) Rules, 1959—specifically, no blood test report was submitted and no evidence proved alcohol levels exceeded legal limits. Additionally, the court noted the chargesheet lacked evidence of public disturbance or criminal behavior required for conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge &

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    Summons - Notice

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge &

  5. 11-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 11-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1001/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court discharged the accused from charges under the Prohibition Act Section 66(1)(b) for consuming alcohol without a permit in public. The court found that mandatory medical and blood test procedures were not followed as required under the Bombay Prohibition (Medical Examination and Blood Test) Rules, 1959—specifically, no blood test report was submitted and no evidence proved alcohol levels exceeded legal limits. Additionally, the court noted the chargesheet lacked evidence of public disturbance or criminal behavior required for conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case