Government of Gujarat vs KAMLESHBHAI BHEMABHAI BARIA — 414/2026
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 85,66(1)(B),. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJDH040004462026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
414/2026
Filing Date
27-01-2026
Registration No
414/2026
Registration Date
27-01-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, LIMKHEDA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE &
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISPOSED OF
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
KAMLESHBHAI BHEMABHAI BARIA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE &
Disposed
WARRANT OF ARREST
WARRANT OF ARREST
SUMMONS - NOTICE
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 06-03-2026 | WARRANT OF ARREST | |
| 19-02-2026 | WARRANT OF ARREST | |
| 27-01-2026 | SUMMONS - NOTICE |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary The court discharged the accused under Section 66(1)(b) of the Prohibition Act due to insufficient evidence. The prosecution failed to produce a mandatory blood test report within seven days as required under the Bombay Prohibition (Medical Examination and Blood Test) Rules, 1959, and could not establish that the accused consumed alcohol without a permit in public or caused public disturbance, making the case unproven. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary The court discharged the accused under Section 66(1)(b) of the Prohibition Act due to insufficient evidence. The prosecution failed to produce a mandatory blood test report within seven days as required under the Bombay Prohibition (Medical Examination and Blood Test) Rules, 1959, and could not establish that the accused consumed alcohol without a permit in public or caused public disturbance, making the case unproven. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts