Government of Gujarat vs PRAVATBHAILUNJABHAI NINAMA — 337/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 85,66(1)(B). Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJDH040003652026

Filing Number

337/2026

Filing Date

22-Jan-2026

Registration No

337/2026

Registration Date

22-Jan-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, LIMKHEDA

Judge

1-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge &

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 16-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 85,66(1)(B)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PRAVATBHAILUNJABHAI NINAMA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court discharged the accused under Section 66(1)(b) of the Prohibition Act, finding insufficient evidence to prove the charge of consuming alcohol without a permit in public. The court noted that the prosecution failed to submit the mandatory medical blood test report as required under The Bombay Prohibition (Medical Examination and Blood Test) Rules, 1959, and also failed to establish the essential elements of the offense, such as causing public disturbance or misconduct. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge &

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    Warrant Of Arrest

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge &

  5. 19-Feb-2026

    Warrant Of Arrest

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge &

  6. 22-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 22-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 337/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court discharged the accused under Section 66(1)(b) of the Prohibition Act, finding insufficient evidence to prove the charge of consuming alcohol without a permit in public. The court noted that the prosecution failed to submit the mandatory medical blood test report as required under The Bombay Prohibition (Medical Examination and Blood Test) Rules, 1959, and also failed to establish the essential elements of the offense, such as causing public disturbance or misconduct. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case