Government of Gujarat vs VIJAYBHAI AMRABHAI MAVI — 240/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 85,66(1)(B). Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJDH040002652026

Filing Number

240/2026

Filing Date

20-Jan-2026

Registration No

240/2026

Registration Date

20-Jan-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, LIMKHEDA

Judge

1-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge &

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 03-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11821035250320

Police Station

LIMKHEDA POLICE STATION - DAHOD DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 85,66(1)(B)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.VIJAYBHAI AMRABHAI MAVI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary The court discharged the accused under the Prohibition Act Section 66(1)(b) due to lack of sufficient evidence. The prosecution failed to provide a mandatory medical blood test report as required by The Bombay Prohibition (Medical Examination and Blood Test) Rules, 1959, which mandates that blood samples be forwarded to the Testing Officer within seven days of collection. Additionally, the court found no evidence of public disturbance or disorderly conduct as required elements of the offense, making the prima facie case unsubstantiated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge &

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    Warrant Of Arrest

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge &

  5. 16-Feb-2026

    Warrant Of Arrest

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge &

  6. 20-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 20-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 240/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The court discharged the accused under the Prohibition Act Section 66(1)(b) due to lack of sufficient evidence. The prosecution failed to provide a mandatory medical blood test report as required by The Bombay Prohibition (Medical Examination and Blood Test) Rules, 1959, which mandates that blood samples be forwarded to the Testing Officer within seven days of collection. Additionally, the court found no evidence of public disturbance or disorderly conduct as required elements of the offense, making the prima facie case unsubstantiated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case