Government of Gujarat vs MAKANSINH PARVATSINH BARIA — 173/2026
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 85,66(1)(B),. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJDH040001952026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
173/2026
Filing Date
17-01-2026
Registration No
173/2026
Registration Date
17-01-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, LIMKHEDA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE &
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISPOSED OF
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
MAKANSINH PARVATSINH BARIA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE &
Disposed
WARRANT OF ARREST
WARRANT OF ARREST
SUMMONS - NOTICE
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 06-03-2026 | WARRANT OF ARREST | |
| 10-02-2026 | WARRANT OF ARREST | |
| 17-01-2026 | SUMMONS - NOTICE |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: The court discharged the accused under the Bombay Prohibition Act Section 66(1)(b) due to insufficient evidence. The prosecution failed to provide mandatory medical blood test reports confirming alcohol content levels and did not establish that the blood sample was sent to the FSL (Forensic Science Laboratory) within the legally required seven days, rendering the case unproven beyond the statutory requirements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The court discharged the accused under the Bombay Prohibition Act Section 66(1)(b) due to insufficient evidence. The prosecution failed to provide mandatory medical blood test reports confirming alcohol content levels and did not establish that the blood sample was sent to the FSL (Forensic Science Laboratory) within the legally required seven days, rendering the case unproven beyond the statutory requirements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts