Government of Gujarat vs RAMESHBHAI HARJIBHAI NINAMA — 171/2026

Case Summary The court discharged the accused under the Bombay Prohibition Act, Section 66(1)(b) for consuming alcohol without a permit in public. The prosecution failed to produce mandatory medical evidence, specifically the blood test report required under the Prohibition (Medical Examination and Blood Test) Rules, 1959, which must reach the FSL within seven days of collection. Without this critical evidence establishing the required alcohol content threshold, the court found insufficient proof of the offense beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.