Government of Gujarat vs BABUBHAI SABURBHAI BARIA — 101/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 85,66(1)(B). Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJDH040001222026

Filing Number

101/2026

Filing Date

16-Jan-2026

Registration No

101/2026

Registration Date

16-Jan-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, LIMKHEDA

Judge

1-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge &

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 16-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 85,66(1)(B)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BABUBHAI SABURBHAI BARIA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court discharged the accused from charges under the Bombay Prohibition Act, Section 66(1)(b), for allegedly consuming alcohol without a permit in public. The court found that the prosecution failed to produce mandatory medical evidence, specifically a blood test report submitted to the FSL within seven days as required by the Medical Examination and Blood Test Rules, 1959, and no corroborating evidence of public disorder or indecent behavior was established on record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge &

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    Warrant Of Arrest

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge &

  5. 12-Feb-2026

    Warrant Of Arrest

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge &

  6. 16-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 16-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 101/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court discharged the accused from charges under the Bombay Prohibition Act, Section 66(1)(b), for allegedly consuming alcohol without a permit in public. The court found that the prosecution failed to produce mandatory medical evidence, specifically a blood test report submitted to the FSL within seven days as required by the Medical Examination and Blood Test Rules, 1959, and no corroborating evidence of public disorder or indecent behavior was established on record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case