Government of Gujarat vs BABUBHAI SABURBHAI BARIA — 101/2026
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 85,66(1)(B),. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJDH040001222026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
101/2026
Filing Date
16-01-2026
Registration No
101/2026
Registration Date
16-01-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, LIMKHEDA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE &
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISPOSED OF
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
BABUBHAI SABURBHAI BARIA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE &
Disposed
WARRANT OF ARREST
WARRANT OF ARREST
SUMMONS - NOTICE
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 06-03-2026 | WARRANT OF ARREST | |
| 12-02-2026 | WARRANT OF ARREST | |
| 16-01-2026 | SUMMONS - NOTICE |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court discharged the accused from charges under the Bombay Prohibition Act, Section 66(1)(b), for allegedly consuming alcohol without a permit in public. The court found that the prosecution failed to produce mandatory medical evidence, specifically a blood test report submitted to the FSL within seven days as required by the Medical Examination and Blood Test Rules, 1959, and no corroborating evidence of public disorder or indecent behavior was established on record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court discharged the accused from charges under the Bombay Prohibition Act, Section 66(1)(b), for allegedly consuming alcohol without a permit in public. The court found that the prosecution failed to produce mandatory medical evidence, specifically a blood test report submitted to the FSL within seven days as required by the Medical Examination and Blood Test Rules, 1959, and no corroborating evidence of public disorder or indecent behavior was established on record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts