Government of Gujarat vs Shaileshbhai Ganpatbhai Koli — 4119/2025
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B,. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJDH030048012025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
4119/2025
Filing Date
29-11-2025
Registration No
4119/2025
Registration Date
29-11-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, DEVGADHBARIA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISPOSED OF
FIR Details
FIR Number
11821050250423
Police Station
SAGTALA POLICE STATION - DAHOD DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Shaileshbhai Ganpatbhai Koli
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 13-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED | |
| 07-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED | |
| 25-02-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED | |
| 09-02-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court DROPPED all criminal proceedings against the accused for alleged liquor consumption under Section 66(1)(b) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949. The court held that the 2017 Amendment deleted Section 118, reclassifying the offense as non-cognizable (maximum punishment less than 3 years), requiring prior magistrate permission for investigation under CrPC Section 155(2). Since police initiated investigation without such permission, it was illegal and vitiated; consequently, the court could not take cognizance based on this defective report. The accused was discharged from bail bonds and seized liquor was ordered destroyed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court DROPPED all criminal proceedings against the accused for alleged liquor consumption under Section 66(1)(b) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949. The court held that the 2017 Amendment deleted Section 118, reclassifying the offense as non-cognizable (maximum punishment less than 3 years), requiring prior magistrate permission for investigation under CrPC Section 155(2). Since police initiated investigation without such permission, it was illegal and vitiated; consequently, the court could not take cognizance based on this defective report. The accused was discharged from bail bonds and seized liquor was ordered destroyed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts