Government of Gujarat vs Shaileshbhai Ganpatbhai Koli — 4119/2025

Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B,. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF on 14th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJDH030048012025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

4119/2025

Filing Date

29-11-2025

Registration No

4119/2025

Registration Date

29-11-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, DEVGADHBARIA

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED OF

FIR Details

FIR Number

11821050250423

Police Station

SAGTALA POLICE STATION - DAHOD DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

GUJARAT (BOMBAY) PROHIBITION ACT, 1949 Section 66(1)B,

Petitioner(s)

Government of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

Shaileshbhai Ganpatbhai Koli

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

14-03-2026

Disposed

13-03-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

07-03-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

25-02-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

09-02-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
ORDER

Summary The court DROPPED all criminal proceedings against the accused for alleged liquor consumption under Section 66(1)(b) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949. The court held that the 2017 Amendment deleted Section 118, reclassifying the offense as non-cognizable (maximum punishment less than 3 years), requiring prior magistrate permission for investigation under CrPC Section 155(2). Since police initiated investigation without such permission, it was illegal and vitiated; consequently, the court could not take cognizance based on this defective report. The accused was discharged from bail bonds and seized liquor was ordered destroyed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court DROPPED all criminal proceedings against the accused for alleged liquor consumption under Section 66(1)(b) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949. The court held that the 2017 Amendment deleted Section 118, reclassifying the offense as non-cognizable (maximum punishment less than 3 years), requiring prior magistrate permission for investigation under CrPC Section 155(2). Since police initiated investigation without such permission, it was illegal and vitiated; consequently, the court could not take cognizance based on this defective report. The accused was discharged from bail bonds and seized liquor was ordered destroyed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, DEVGADHBARIA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case