Government of Gujarat vs Karanbhai Tersingbhai Baria — 4110/2025

Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B,. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF on 14th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJDH030047922025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

4110/2025

Filing Date

29-11-2025

Registration No

4110/2025

Registration Date

29-11-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, DEVGADHBARIA

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED OF

FIR Details

FIR Number

11821050250527

Police Station

SAGTALA POLICE STATION - DAHOD DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

GUJARAT (BOMBAY) PROHIBITION ACT, 1949 Section 66(1)B,

Petitioner(s)

Government of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

Karanbhai Tersingbhai Baria

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

14-03-2026

Disposed

13-03-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

07-03-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

25-02-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

09-02-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
ORDER

Case Summary The court dropped the criminal proceedings against the accused charged under Section 66(1)(b) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949 (liquor consumption). The court found that the 2017 Amendment deleted the provision making all offences cognizable, thereby reclassifying the offense as non-cognizable (maximum punishment under 3 years). Since the investigating officer failed to obtain prior magistrate permission as mandated by Section 155(2) CrPC before investigation, the investigation was deemed illegal and vitiated, rendering the charge-sheet inadmissible. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The court dropped the criminal proceedings against the accused charged under Section 66(1)(b) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949 (liquor consumption). The court found that the 2017 Amendment deleted the provision making all offences cognizable, thereby reclassifying the offense as non-cognizable (maximum punishment under 3 years). Since the investigating officer failed to obtain prior magistrate permission as mandated by Section 155(2) CrPC before investigation, the investigation was deemed illegal and vitiated, rendering the charge-sheet inadmissible. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, DEVGADHBARIA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case