Government of Gujarat vs Karanbhai Tersingbhai Baria — 4110/2025
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B,. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJDH030047922025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
4110/2025
Filing Date
29-11-2025
Registration No
4110/2025
Registration Date
29-11-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, DEVGADHBARIA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISPOSED OF
FIR Details
FIR Number
11821050250527
Police Station
SAGTALA POLICE STATION - DAHOD DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Karanbhai Tersingbhai Baria
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 13-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED | |
| 07-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED | |
| 25-02-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED | |
| 09-02-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary The court dropped the criminal proceedings against the accused charged under Section 66(1)(b) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949 (liquor consumption). The court found that the 2017 Amendment deleted the provision making all offences cognizable, thereby reclassifying the offense as non-cognizable (maximum punishment under 3 years). Since the investigating officer failed to obtain prior magistrate permission as mandated by Section 155(2) CrPC before investigation, the investigation was deemed illegal and vitiated, rendering the charge-sheet inadmissible. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary The court dropped the criminal proceedings against the accused charged under Section 66(1)(b) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949 (liquor consumption). The court found that the 2017 Amendment deleted the provision making all offences cognizable, thereby reclassifying the offense as non-cognizable (maximum punishment under 3 years). Since the investigating officer failed to obtain prior magistrate permission as mandated by Section 155(2) CrPC before investigation, the investigation was deemed illegal and vitiated, rendering the charge-sheet inadmissible. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts