Government of Gujarat vs Narvatbhai Ramabhai Baria — 4101/2025
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJDH030047802025
Filing Number
4101/2025
Filing Date
28-Nov-2025
Registration No
4101/2025
Registration Date
28-Nov-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, DEVGADHBARIA
Judge
1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISPOSED OF
Last updated 03-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11821050251055
Police Station
SAGTALA POLICE STATION - DAHOD DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.Narvatbhai Ramabhai Baria
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
Order
The court dropped criminal proceedings against the accused for liquor consumption under Section 66(1)(b) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949, holding that the investigating officer illegally initiated investigation without prior Magistrate's permission. The court reasoned that the 2017 Amendment deleted the provision classifying the offense as cognizable, making it non-cognizable under CrPC/BNSS (maximum punishment under six months), and therefore investigation required mandatory Magistrate's authorization, which was absent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
13-Mar-2026
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
07-Mar-2026
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
25-Feb-2026
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
09-Feb-2026
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
22-Jan-2026
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
13-Jan-2026
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
12-Dec-2025
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
28-Nov-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
28-Nov-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 4101/2025
The court dropped criminal proceedings against the accused for liquor consumption under Section 66(1)(b) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949, holding that the investigating officer illegally initiated investigation without prior Magistrate's permission. The court reasoned that the 2017 Amendment deleted the provision classifying the offense as cognizable, making it non-cognizable under CrPC/BNSS (maximum punishment under six months), and therefore investigation required mandatory Magistrate's authorization, which was absent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts