Government of Gujarat vs Narvatbhai Ramabhai Baria — 4101/2025
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B,. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJDH030047802025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
4101/2025
Filing Date
28-11-2025
Registration No
4101/2025
Registration Date
28-11-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, DEVGADHBARIA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISPOSED OF
FIR Details
FIR Number
11821050251055
Police Station
SAGTALA POLICE STATION - DAHOD DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Narvatbhai Ramabhai Baria
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 13-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED | |
| 07-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED | |
| 25-02-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED | |
| 09-02-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court dropped criminal proceedings against the accused for liquor consumption under Section 66(1)(b) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949, holding that the investigating officer illegally initiated investigation without prior Magistrate's permission. The court reasoned that the 2017 Amendment deleted the provision classifying the offense as cognizable, making it non-cognizable under CrPC/BNSS (maximum punishment under six months), and therefore investigation required mandatory Magistrate's authorization, which was absent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court dropped criminal proceedings against the accused for liquor consumption under Section 66(1)(b) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949, holding that the investigating officer illegally initiated investigation without prior Magistrate's permission. The court reasoned that the 2017 Amendment deleted the provision classifying the offense as cognizable, making it non-cognizable under CrPC/BNSS (maximum punishment under six months), and therefore investigation required mandatory Magistrate's authorization, which was absent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts