Government of Gujarat vs Apsingbhai Navalsingbhai Patel — 4067/2025

Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B,. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF on 14th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJDH030047442025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

4067/2025

Filing Date

28-11-2025

Registration No

4067/2025

Registration Date

28-11-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, DEVGADHBARIA

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED OF

FIR Details

FIR Number

11821050251172

Police Station

SAGTALA POLICE STATION - DAHOD DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

GUJARAT (BOMBAY) PROHIBITION ACT, 1949 Section 66(1)B,
MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1988 Section 185,

Petitioner(s)

Government of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

Apsingbhai Navalsingbhai Patel

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

14-03-2026

Disposed

13-03-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

07-03-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

25-02-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

09-02-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
ORDER

The court dropped all criminal proceedings against the accused for alleged violations of the Gujarat Prohibition Act and Motor Vehicles Act, finding that the investigating officer illegally initiated investigation into non-cognizable offences without obtaining mandatory prior permission from the competent magistrate. The court held that the 2017 amendment to the Gujarat Prohibition Act reclassified these offences as non-cognizable (maximum punishment under six months), and the conditional arrest power under the Motor Vehicles Act does not alter their non-cognizable nature, making the entire investigation vitiated and cognizance impossible. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court dropped all criminal proceedings against the accused for alleged violations of the Gujarat Prohibition Act and Motor Vehicles Act, finding that the investigating officer illegally initiated investigation into non-cognizable offences without obtaining mandatory prior permission from the competent magistrate. The court held that the 2017 amendment to the Gujarat Prohibition Act reclassified these offences as non-cognizable (maximum punishment under six months), and the conditional arrest power under the Motor Vehicles Act does not alter their non-cognizable nature, making the entire investigation vitiated and cognizance impossible. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, DEVGADHBARIA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case