Government of Gujarat vs Hareshbhai alias Harish Rameshbhai Nayak — 3997/2025

Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B,. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF on 14th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJDH030046712025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

3997/2025

Filing Date

27-11-2025

Registration No

3997/2025

Registration Date

27-11-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, DEVGADHBARIA

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED OF

FIR Details

FIR Number

11821005250856

Police Station

DEVGADH BARIA POLICE STATION - DAHOD DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

GUJARAT (BOMBAY) PROHIBITION ACT, 1949 Section 66(1)B,
MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1988 Section 185,

Petitioner(s)

Government of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

Hareshbhai alias Harish Rameshbhai Nayak

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

14-03-2026

Disposed

13-03-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

07-03-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

25-02-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

09-02-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
ORDER

Summary The court dropped the criminal proceedings and discharged the accused because the investigating officer illegally initiated investigation into non-cognizable offences under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949 (Section 66(1)(b)) without obtaining mandatory prior permission from the Magistrate as required under Section 174(2) of BNSS. The court held that the 2017 Amendment deleted the provision making all offences cognizable, thereby classifying this offence as non-cognizable due to its maximum punishment of six months, and that procedural safeguards cannot be circumvented even under special statutes. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court dropped the criminal proceedings and discharged the accused because the investigating officer illegally initiated investigation into non-cognizable offences under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949 (Section 66(1)(b)) without obtaining mandatory prior permission from the Magistrate as required under Section 174(2) of BNSS. The court held that the 2017 Amendment deleted the provision making all offences cognizable, thereby classifying this offence as non-cognizable due to its maximum punishment of six months, and that procedural safeguards cannot be circumvented even under special statutes. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, DEVGADHBARIA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case